Landing Page Draft
Draft a full, research-backed landing page — hero, sections, calls to action (CTAs) — and save it as a file with a short summary of what you produced.
When to use
- A stakeholder asks for a new landing page for a product, offer, or campaign.
- You need a research-grounded page draft before a designer or copy reviewer takes over.
- An existing page needs a full rewrite rather than a small tweak.
- A campaign launch requires a dedicated page and none exists yet.
Tools
read-file— pull in prior briefs, positioning notes, or an earlier draft to build on.write-file— save the finished landing page draft as a file.complete-task— close out the task with a structured summary of the draft.
Playbook
- Read the task brief carefully: product/offer, target audience, primary goal (signup, demo, purchase), and any brand voice constraints.
- If a prior brief, positioning doc, or earlier draft is referenced, pull it in with
read-fileso the draft builds on existing research rather than repeating it. - Identify the core value proposition: the single sentence that explains why this audience should care right now.
- Draft the hero section: headline, subheadline, and primary CTA. The headline should state the outcome, not the feature.
- Draft supporting sections in a logical order: problem/pain, solution/how it works, proof (testimonials, stats, logos), objection handling (FAQ or risk reversal), and a final CTA section.
- Write every CTA as a specific action tied to the goal (for example "Start your free trial" rather than "Submit"), and repeat the primary CTA at least twice on the page.
- Assemble the full draft as clean markdown with clear section headings so it can be handed to a designer or copywriter without further interpretation.
- Save the complete draft using
write-file, naming the file clearly after the product or campaign it serves. - Finish with
complete-task, summarizing the page's structure (sections included), the primary CTA used, and the file path where the draft was saved.
Failure modes
- No brief or prior research provided -> do not invent product claims; note the gap and draft only what can be supported, flagging missing inputs in the summary.
- Conflicting instructions (for example two different target audiences) -> pick the primary goal stated in the task, note the ambiguity in the summary, and proceed.
- Draft grows too long or unfocused -> cut back to hero, three to five core sections, and one final CTA rather than padding with filler.
- Unable to write the file -> stop, do not fabricate a save confirmation, and report the failure via
complete-taskas blocked.
Done when
- A complete landing page draft (hero, body sections, CTAs) has been saved as a file via
write-file. - The task is closed via
complete-taskwith a summary of the page's sections and the file path. - No section relies on unstated or fabricated product claims beyond what the brief or prior research supports.